PAGES: 697-702 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760160294 Full paper
Culture media profoundly affect Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis growth, adhesion and biofilm development

Manjula M Weerasekera1,4,+, Gayan K Wijesinghe1, Thilini A Jayarathna1, Chinthika P Gunasekara1, Neluka Fernando1, Nilwala Kottegoda2,3,4, Lakshman P Samaranayake5

1University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Nugegoda, Gangodawila, Sri Lanka
2University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Chemistry, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
3Sri Lanka Institute of Nanotechnology, Nanoscience and Technology Park, Pitipana, Homagama, Sri Lanka
4University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Center for Advanced Material Research, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
5University of Queensland, Department of Oral Microbiomics and Infection, Brisbane, Australia


As there are sparse data on the impact of growth media on the phenomenon of biofilm development for Candida we evaluated the efficacy of three culture media on growth, adhesion and biofilm formation of two pathogenic yeasts, Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis. The planktonic phase yeast growth, either as monocultures or mixed cultures, in sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB), yeast nitrogen base (YNB), and RPMI 1640 was compared, and adhesion as well as biofilm formation were monitored using MTT and crystal violet (CV) assays and scanning electron microscopy. Planktonic cells of C. albicans, C. tropicalis and their 1:1 co-culture showed maximal growth in SDB. C. albicans/C. tropicalis adhesion was significantly facilitated in RPMI 1640 although the YNB elicited the maximum growth for C. tropicalis. Similarly, the biofilm growth was uniformly higher for both species in RPMI 1640, and C. tropicalis was the slower biofilm former in all three media. Scanning electron microscopy images tended to confirm the results of MTT and CV assay. Taken together, our data indicate that researchers should pay heed to the choice of laboratory culture media when comparing relative planktonic/biofilm growth of Candida. There is also a need for standardisation of biofilm development media so as to facilitate cross comparisons between laboratories.

Candida species are commensals in about 75% of healthy individuals (Ghannoum et al. 2010) and cause opportunistic infections in compromised patient groups (Scully et al. 1994). Amongst the pathogenic Candida species C. albicans is generally considered the most virulent and the commonest fungal pathogen in humans (Cannon et al. 1995) followed by C. tropicalis (Cannon et al. 1995). Both species have the ability to form biofilms and are responsible for a whole array of biofilm-related infections (Douglas 2002).

Biofilms are defined as microbial communities attached to either a biotic or an abiotic surface and encased in an extracellular matrix (Ramage et al. 2001). It has been estimated that up to 65% of human infections on implanted biomaterials and host surfaces are due to formation of biofilms (Pierce et al. 2008). The biofilm mode has unique characteristics in contrast to the planktonic form, such as their exquisite resistance to antimicrobials (Ramage et al. 2001, Zijnge et al. 2010) mainly due to the extracellular matrix encasing the biofilm. In comparison to the biofilm architecture of C. albicans, comprising yeast blastospores, hyphae and pseudohyphae, C. tropicalis biofilms exist essentially as a multilayer structure of yeast blastospores; yet in both cases, the biofilms are embedded in extracellular matrix (Al-Fattani & Douglas 2006). Despite their structural diversity, biofilm development of both species are known to be dictated by the quality of the substrate biomaterial, the growth medium (Fracchia et al. 2010), carbohydrate source and concentration (Jin et al. 2004) and pH (Marsh 2006).

Historically, biofilms of Candida have been evaluated in laboratory settings using a model system such as microtiter plates (Nett et al. 2011), flow cells (Foster & Kolenbrander 2004), constant depth film fermenters (Douglas 2002), an artificial mouth model system (Rasiah et al. 2005, Weerasekera et al. 2013) and perfused biofilm fermenters (Douglas 2002). Of these, the microtiter plate system is the most popular due to its versatility, simplicity, reproducibility, and efficacy. Many researchers have studied Candida biofilms using this system particularly the biofilm architecture either in monocultures or mixed cultures (Jin et al. 2004, Bandara et al. 2010, Nett et al. 2011).

Despite burgeoning data of the effect of varying culture media on candidal growth (Serrano-Fujarte et al. 2015), adhesion and biofilm development in laboratory settings there is no consensus recommendation to date, for a specific, choice medium suitable for in vitro biofilm experiments. Therefore, we investigated the effect of three different culture media on the growth, adhesion and biofilm formation of C. albicans and C. tropicalis, and their mixed biofilms using the microtiter plate system.



Strains and culture conditions - C. albicans (ATCC 10231) and C. tropicalis (ATCC 13803) type strains were used in this study. Cultures were maintained on Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) slants in stock cultures. Stock cultures were subcultured onto freshly prepared SDA plates and incubated at 35ºC for 48 hours. For all planktonic and biofilm assays, Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) supplemented with 100 mM glucose, Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (SDB, HiMedia, India) and RPMI 1640 (Gibco, USA) were used as culture media.

Planktonic growth assay - Planktonic growth rate was determined as described previously (Jin et al. 2004) with modifications. Briefly, 106 cells/mL suspensions of C. albicans and C. tropicalis were prepared in sterile YNB supplemented with 100 mM glucose, SDB and RPMI 1640. A 1:1 suspension of C. albicans and C. tropicalis cells was also prepared. A volume of 100 µL of organism suspensions were inoculated in triplicate into a sterile, flat bottom, polystyrene 96 wells microtiter plate. The growth rate of planktonic Candida cells was determined by optical density measurement of the suspensions in each well at 492 nm (Jin et al. 2004) at 2 h intervals for 14 h using a microtiter plate reader (SPECTRAmaxPLUS384 Molecular Devices, Inc, USA), and growth curves were prepared.

Candida adhesion assay - Standard cell suspensions (107 cells/mL) of C. albicans and C. tropicalis were prepared in sterile YNB containing 100 mM glucose, SDB and RPMI 1640. In addition to the monospecies suspensions, 1:1 mixture of a dual species suspensions were prepared by mixing equal volumes of each species suspension.

First, 100 µL/well standard cell suspensions of C. albicans, C. tropicalis and mixed species were inoculated in triplicate in to wells of a sterile flat bottomed microtiter plate and incubated for 90 min at 37ºC for initial adhesion (Jin et al. 2004). After 90 min incubation, the plate was washed carefully twice with 200 µL of sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and the adherent cells were quantified using crystal violet (CV) (HiMedia, India) assay (Traba & Liang 2011) and MTT (Traba & Liang 2011, Tsang et al. 2012) (tetrazolium salt 3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) assay with modifications.

For CV assay, 100 µL of 1% CV solution was added to each well and incubated for 20 min at 37ºC and plate was washed carefully thrice with sterile PBS. Finally CV stained cells were decolorised by adding 200 µL/well of 95% ethanol. Then 100 µL of ethanol was transferred to a new microtiter plate and absorbance was measured at 595 nm using a microtiter plate reader (SPECTRAmaxPLUS384 Molecular Devices, Inc, USA). For MTT assay 1 mg/mL working solution of MTT was prepared by diluting 5 mg/mL stock solution. To quantify the adhered living cell mass, 50 µL of working solution was added to each well and incubated at 37ºC for 4 h. After incubation, MTT solution was carefully aspirated. Dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) 100 mL was added to each well to solubilize the formazon product and absorbance was measured by setting the detection and reference wavelengths at 570 nm and 630 nm, respectively.

Biofilm development assay - Growth rate assay was performed using the method described previously (Jin et al. 2004) with modifications. Briefly, standard cell suspensions of C. albicans, C. tropicalis and mixed species were prepared in sterile PBS. Standard cell suspensions (100 µL) were inoculated in triplicate to sterile flat bottomed microtiter plates and the plates were incubated for 90 min at 37ºC for initial adhesion. After the adhesion phase, the plates were washed twice with 200 µL/well sterile PBS to remove non-adherent cells and the wells were filled with 100 µL/well sterile culture media. Plates were incubated at 37ºC up to 96 h and the culture medium were replenished daily. The biofilm cell mass was quantified at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h using CV assay and MTT assay as described above. Growth curves were prepared in order to determine the effect of the three different media on biofilm growth.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) - For examination of ultrastructure, biofilms of C. albicans were formed on 10 mm diameter coverslips, processed and examined. Coverslips were pretreated with concentrated sulphuric acid, 95% ethanol and foetal bovine serum prior to biofilm formation (Pu et al. 2014). Formed biofilms were fixed with 2.5% glutraldehyde for 2 h and serially dehydrated with ethanol. After overnight drying in a desiccator, biofilms were coated with gold and examined using the SEM (Hitachi SU 6600) (Harriott & Noverr 2009, Tsang et al. 2012).

Statistics - Each experiment was performed in triplicates on two different occasions. The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS16.0 for windows. One-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were performed to analyse the differences among multiple means. P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.



Growth rate of planktonic Candida in different culture media - In the YNB medium supplemented with 100 mM glucose, both C. albicans and the 1:1 mixed species co-culture reached a plateau at 10 h (Fig. 1A). The maximum growth was observed in C. albicans mono culture followed by the 1:1 mixed species co-culture and C. tropicalis. In both SDB and RPMI 1640 medium, all three cultures reached a plateau at 10 h (Fig. 1B-C). However the growth of C. albicans was lower than the C. tropicalis and 1:1 mixed species co-culture in RPMI 1640 medium (Fig. 1C).



On comparing the relative growth of the yeasts in culture media the maximum growth of all three planktonic cultures was achieved with SDB (Fig. 1A-C).

Effect of culture media on yeast adhesion - Both CV and MTT assays were carried out to evaluate the adhesion of Candida species. And the results correlated well. C. albicans and 1:1 mixed species co-cultures demonstrated increased adhesion in all three culture media compared with the PBS control (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2A-B). C. tropicalis cells showed the maximal adhesion in YNB supplemented with 100 mM glucose but SDB had no significant effect on adhesion compared to the PBS control (p = 0.981). Maximum adhesion was noted with RPMI 1640 for both C. albicans and the 1:1 mixed species co-cultures (Fig. 2A-B). There was no difference in adhesion after 90 min when PBS was used as a negative control for C. albicans, C. tropicalis and 1:1 mixed species.



Biofilm growth - Growth of biofilms were quantified using both CV and MTT assays. The results of CV and MTT assays correlated well (Fig. 3A-B). Growth of all three biofilms was uniformly high and reached a plateau at 72 h in all three culture media. The maximum growth of all three biofilms was noted with RPMI 1640 followed by SDB and YNB (Fig. 3A-B). The latter medium seemed to be least supportive of biofilm growth in general. Further, C. tropicalis biofilm growth in YNB was minimal compared with other media (Fig. 3A-B).



Ultrastructure of biofilms in RPMI 1640 medium - In quantitative terms, as RPMI 1640 induced most biofilm growth in the two yeast species. Hence we further qualitatively evaluated their ultrastructure after 72 h growth. On SEM, marked hyphal development and a rather profuse extracellular matrix were noted with C. albicans in RPMI 1640 (Fig. 4A).

This was not the case for C. tropicalis biofilms, which was totally devoid of either hyphal elements or an extracellular matrix (Fig. 4B). On the other hand, in the dual species biofilms of C. albicans and C. tropicalis, a mixed picture was seen with moderate numbers of hyphal elements of C. albicans interspersed with blastospore aggregates of C. tropicalis (Fig. 4C). Overall these results generally support the data from the adhesion assay, where C. albicans biofilm growth enhancement was particularly profuse in RPMI 1640 medium.



C. albicans is the commonest human oral fungal pathogen followed by C. tropicalis. Both species are found in nature as co-inhabitants in the oral cavity (Samaranayake et al. 1987). Morbidity or co-morbidity due to these species are extensive due to their potential to form biofilms on both biotic, as well as abiotic surfaces (e.g., venous catheters, implants) (Jin et al. 2004, Zijnge et al. 2010). Adhesion to latter surfaces is an essential prerequisite for subsequent biofilm development, and the biomass of a mature biofilm depends to a great extent on the degree of such initial adhesion. Hence in this investigation we monitored the effect of the three most commonly used culture media for Candida, on their planktonic growth, adhesion and biofilm formation.

In general, the planktonic growth, as opposed to biofilm growth, of the mono and the co-culture of the two yeast species was most profuse in SDB, followed by YNB and RPMI 1640. Both SDB and YNB media have a high content of glucose (20 g/L and 18 g/L, respectively) in comparison to RPMI 1640 medium (2 g/L glucose). The copious growth of Candida species in glucose-rich media and its clinical implications have been reported previously (Samaranayake & MacFarlane 1985, Samaranayake et al. 1986) and our data further confirm these findings.

As regards the yeast adhesion to the substrate, C. tropicalis exhibited the maximal adhesion in YNB medium supplemented with 100 mM glucose. On the other hand, C. albicans and the mixed species, co-culture exhibited maximal adhesion with RPMI 1640 medium, and lastly all three biofilm showed the maximal growth in RPMI 1640.

Compared to YNB and SD broth, RPMI 1640 is a nutrient-rich medium which contains amino acids (aas) and also known to mimic the composition of human fluids (Kucharíková et al. 2011). RPMI 1640 contains a variety of aas including high concentration of L-Glutamine, L-Arginine, L- Asparagine as well as vitamins and inorganic salts. However compared to YNB and SDB, glucose content is low in RPMI 1640 medium. This may be one reason for the higher planktonic growth noted in SDB which had the highest glucose concentration of the three growth media. RPMI 1640 is recommended for determining the susceptibility of planktonic cell for antifungals using MIC (micro and macro dilution methods) according to the NCCLS M27-A3 protocol (CLSI 2008).

On the other hand, aas are not constituents of either YNB or SD broth and they have a rich peptone and glucose content. This high glucose content may favor the planktonic growth of Candida. The presence of higher concentrations of readily available aas will support a favorable biofilm growth in RPMI medium compared to more complex peptone containing medium.

This medium has also been used previously for C. albicans attachment on polyurethane prior to subcutaneous catheter implantation in vivo (Kucharíková et al. 2010, 2011). As reported above this finding contrast with very high planktonic growth of C. albicans, C. tropicalis and their co-cultures with SDB but not with RPMI 1640. This observation is instructive, as it illustrates starkly the variations in substrate utilization by Candida during different growth phases.

Although C. albicans in vitro biofilm growth has been extensively studied there are limited studies on the biofilm forming ability of C. tropicalis. Interestingly we were unable to find any reports in the literature on neither the mixed biofilm growth of C. albicans and C. tropicalis nor the effect of media on biofilm formation of C. tropicalis.

Turning to the biofilm forming ability of the two species, clearly C. albicans was a far superior biofilm former than C. tropicalis, and RPMI 1640 nurtured the maximal biofilm growth relative to the other two media. These observations agree with the findings of Al-Fattani and Douglas (2006). Although C. albicans biofilm forming ability has been extensively studied there is no data on the mixed biofilms of these two species to compare with the current findings.

In quantitative terms, as RPMI 1640 induced most biofilm growth in the two yeast species, we further evaluated the qualitative nature of their ultrastructure. The architecture of biofilms in RPMI 1640 clearly confirmed the quantitative data. The complex organization of C. albicans biofilm with a dense growth of yeasts with ramifying hyphae, budding elements and bud scars with a profuse extracellular matrix were clearly evident in SEM micrographs. These results are in agreement with previous workers who reported RPMI 1640 heightened the hyphal formation in C. albicans biofilms (Kucharíková et al. 2011). In contrast, C. tropicalis biofilms in RPMI 1640 were devoid of hyphae although we noted increased blastospore density and micro colony development. Surprisingly, the latter biofilms also lacked an extracellular matrix even though it is known that biofilms of C. tropicalis also synthesized large amounts of extracellular polymeric material as well as hyphae (Bizerra et al. 2008). One reason for the conflicting observations could be the fresh clinical strains of C. tropicalis and the polyvinyl chloride (PVC) substrate used by previous workers (Bizerra et al. 2008). Additionally, inter-species and inter-strain heterogeneity of biofilm architecture could account for the differing observations between researchers. Finally, the mixed culture biofilms clearly depicted the disparate biofilm attributes of the two species with distinct blastospores of C. tropicalis devoid of hyphae interlaced with hyphae-bearing C. albicans. The mixed-biofilm growth however was relatively sparse and essentially largely devoid of an extracellular matrix. Hence we hypothesised a possible synergistic growth and biofilm forming effect when the two Candida species in co-culture. Yet, such a finding was not observed. In vitro, C. albicans co-aggregates and metabolically interacts and forms biofilms with a range of bacteria (Shirtliff et al. 2009, Thein et al. 2009). Studies of Streptococcus mutans and C. albicans biofilm co-culture have provided evidence for enhanced biofilm formation of both S. mutans and C. albicans (Falsetta et al. 2014, Sztajer et al. 2014). It is known that C. albicans promotes the biofilm formation of S. mutans in vitro. However based on our results of the two studied Candida species no such effect was noted in co-culture.

In conclusion, C. albicans and C. tropicalis displayed strikingly variable, heterogeneous growth, adhesion as well as biofilm forming potential and architecture in different growth media. From our data, we conclude that RPMI 1640 medium in general has the most potency to initiate and development of in vitro biofilms of the two tested Candida species. Considering the marked variations in Candida cell adhesion and biofilm development in different media described above, it is tempting to propose that RPMI 1640 should be considered by researchers in this field as a choice medium for such experiments in order to generate consistent and reliable data for cross comparison purposes. However, it is essential to evaluate a spectrum of other pathogenic Candida species in this medium before substantive conclusions are made.



To Dr P Ranasinghe, Industrial Technology Institute, Sri Lanka, for providing facilities for Microtiter plate reader. Also staff members of the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Sri Lanka, are acknowledged for their support.



Al-Fattani MA, Douglas LJ. Biofilm matrix of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis: chemical composition and role in drug resistance. J Med Microbiol. 2006; 55(Pt 8): 999-1008.

Bandara HM, Lam OL, Watt RM, Jin LJ, Samaranayake LP. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides variably modulate in vitro biofilm formation of Candida species. J Med Microbiol. 2010; 59(Pt 10): 1225-34.

Bizerra FC, Nakamura CV, de Poersch C, Svidzinski TIE, Quesada RMB, Goldenberg S, et al. Characteristics of biofilm formation by Candida tropicalis and antifungal resistance. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008; 8(3): 442-50.

Cannon RD, Holmes AR, Mason AB, Monk BC. Oral Candida: clearance, colonization, or candidiasis? J Dent Res. 1995; 74(5): 1152-61.

CLSI - Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institiute. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved Standard. Third Edition. CLSI document M27-A3. Wayne: CLSI; 2008.

Douglas LJ. Medical importance of biofilms in Candida infections. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2002; 19(3): 139-43.

Falsetta ML, Klein MI, Colonne PM, Scott-Anne K, Gregoire S, Pai CH, et al. Symbiotic relationship between Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans synergizes virulence of plaque biofilms in vivo. Infect Immun. 2014; 82(5): 1968-81.

Foster JS, Kolenbrander PE. Development of a multispecies oral bacterial community in a saliva-conditioned flow cell. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70(7): 4340-8.

Fracchia L, Cavallo M, Allegrone G, Martinotti MG. A lactobacillus-derived biosurfactant inhibits biofilm formation of human pathogenic Candida albicans biofilm producers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 2: 827-37.

Ghannoum MA, Jurevic RJ, Mukherjee PK, Cui F, Sikaroodi M, Naqvi A, et al. Characterization of the oral fungal microbiome (mycobiome) in healthy individuals. PLoS Pathog. 2010; 6(1): e1000713.

Harriott MM, Noverr MC. Candida albicans and Staphylococcus aureus form polymicrobial biofilms: effects on antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53(9): 3914-22.

Jin Y, Samaranayake LP, Samaranayake Y, Yip HK. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans is variably affected by saliva and dietary sugars. Arch Oral Biol. 2004; 49(10): 789-98.

Kucharíková S, Tournu H, Holtappels M, Van Dijck P, Lagrou K. In vivo efficacy of anidulafungin against mature Candida albicans biofilms in a novel rat model of catheter-associated Candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 54(10): 4474-5.

Kucharíková S, Tournu H, Lagrou K, Van Dijck P, Bujdáková H. Detailed comparison of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata biofilms under different conditions and their susceptibility to caspofungin and anidulafungin. J Med Microbiol. 2011; 60(Pt 9): 1261-9.

Marsh PD. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community - implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health. 2006; 6(Suppl. 1): S14.

Nett JE, Cain MT, Crawford K, Andes DR. Optimizing a Candida biofilm microtiter plate model for measurement of antifungal susceptibility by tetrazolium salt assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2011; 49(4): 1426-33.

Pierce CG, Uppuluri P, Tristan AR, Wormley FL Jr, Mowat E, Ramage G, et al. A simple reproducible 96 well plate-based method for the formation of fungal biofilms and its application to antifungal suceptibility testing. Nat Protoc. 2008; 3(9): 1494-500.

Pu Y, Liu A, Zheng Y, Ye BIN. In vitro damage of Candida albicans biofilms by chitosan. Exp Ther Med. 2014; 8(3): 929-34.

Ramage G, Vandewalle K, Wickes BL, López-Ribot JL. Characteristics of biofilm formation by Candida albicans. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2001; 18(4): 163-70.

Rasiah IA, Wong L, Anderson SA, Sissons CH. Variation in bacterial DGGE patterns from human saliva: over time, between individuals and in corresponding dental plaque microcosms. Arch Oral Biol. 2005; 50(9): 779-87.

Samaranayake LP, Hughes A, Weetman DA, MacFarlane TW. Growth and acid production of Candida species in human saliva supplemented with glucose. J Oral Pathol. 1986; 15(5): 251-4.

Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW, Williamson M. A comparison of sabouraud dextrose and Pagano Levin agar media for the detection and isolation of yeasts from clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1987; 25(1): 162-84.

Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW. On the role of dietary carbohydrates in the pathogenesis of oral candidosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1985; 27(1): 1-5.

Scully C, EL-Kabir M, Samaranayaka LP. Candida and oral candidosis: A Review. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1994; 5(2): 125-57.

Serrano-Fujarte I, López-Romero E, Reyna-López GE, Martínez-Gámez MA, Vegagonzález A, Cuéllar-Cruz M. Influence of culture media on biofilm formation by Candida species and response of sessile cells to antifungals and oxidative stress. Bio Med Res Int. 2015; 2015: 15 pp.

Shirtliff ME, Peters BM, Jabra-Rizk MA. Cross-kingdom interactions: Candida albicans and bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009; 299(1): 1-8.

Sztajer H, Szafranski SP, Tomasch J, Reck M, Nimtz M, Rohde M, et al. Cross-feeding and interkingdom communication in dual-species biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. ISME J. 2014; 8(11): 2256-71.

Thein ZM, Seneviratne CJ, Samaranayake YH, Samaranayake LP. Community lifestyle of Candida in mixed biofilms: a mini review. Mycoses. 2009; 52(6): 467-75.

Traba C, Liang JF. Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms to reactive discharge gases. Biofouling. 2011; 27(7): 763-72.

Tsang PW-K, Bandara HM, Fong W-P. Purpurin suppresses Candida albicans biofilm formation and hyphal development. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(11): 1-8.

Weerasekera MM, Sissons CH, Wong L, Anderson S, Holmes AR, Cannon RD. Use of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis for the identification of mixed oral yeasts in human saliva. J Med Microbiol. 2013; 62(Pt 2): 319-30.

Zijnge MV, van Leeuwen MB, Degener JE, Abbas F, Thurnheer T, Gmür R, et al. Oral biofilm architecture on natural teeth. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5(2): e9321.


+ Corresponding author: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received 4 July 2016
Accepted 25 July 2016calis


Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

Av. Brasil 4365, Castelo Mourisco
sala 201, Manguinhos, 21040-900
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Tel.: +55-21-2562-1222

This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.



marca fiocruzmarca brasil
marca faperjmarca cnpqmarca capes n marca cope