Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, VOLUME 114 | DECEMBER 2019
Gestation and breastfeeding in schistosomotic mice differentially alters the expression of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in adult offspring
1Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Laboratório de Imunopatologia Keizo Asami, Recife, PE, Brasil
2Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto de Pesquisas Aggeu Magalhães, Recife, PE, Brasil
BACKGROUND Breastfeeding or gestation in schistosomotic mothers can cause long-term alterations in the immune response of offspring.
OBJECTIVES Evaluate the expression of histone deacetylases (HDACs) (all classes), the production of cytokines by T and B lymphocytes and macrophages, and the frequency of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+-cells in adult offspring born and/or suckled by schistosomotic mothers.
METHODS We harvested splenocytes from offspring born to (BIM), suckled by (SIM), or born to/suckled by (BSIM) schistosomotic mothers and animals from noninfected mothers (Control) at seven-weeks old and cultured them with/without Concanavalin A. HDAC expression was evaluated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and cytokines and membrane markers were evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS).
FINDINGS Compared to Control, BIM mice showed increased expression of HDAC9 and frequency of CD4+IL-10+-cells. The SIM group had increased expression of HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC6, HDAC7, HDAC10, Sirt2, Sirt5, Sirt6, and Sirt7. The BSIM group only had increased HDAC10 expression. The SIM and BSIM groups exhibited decreased frequencies of CD4+IL-4+-cells and CD4+CD25+FoxP3+-cells, along with a higher frequency of CD14+IL-10+-cells and an increase in CD45R/B220+IL-10+-cells. The BSIM group also showed a high frequency of CD4+IL10+-cells.
MAIN CONCLUSIONS Breastfeeding induced the expression of HDACs from various classes involved in reducing inflammatory responses. However, gestation enhanced the expression of a single HDAC and breastfeeding or gestation appears to favour multiple IL-10-dependent pathways, but not cells with a regulatory phenotype.
A high prevalence of chronic schistosomiasis in pregnant women and women of childbearing age has been reported,(1) and the effects of maternal infection have raised questions regarding the immunity of the offspring.
It is known that the immunological status of schistosomotic mothers can induce long-term alterations in the immune response of the offspring.(2,3,4,5) An experimental study on the effects of gestation and breastfeeding in infected mothers, separately, showed that gestation in these mothers led to potential immunosuppression in adult offspring, with elevated production of IL-10 and lower levels of anti-ovalbumin (OA) antibodies.(2) In addition, offspring born to infected mothers had a lower frequency of B lymphocytes, and the capacity for antigen presentation by CD11c+ cells was partially impaired.(3) In contrast, it has also been observed that adult mice previously breastfed by schistosomotic mothers exhibited improvement in the production of anti-OA antibodies(2) and in the antigen presentation ability of B lymphocytes through an increase in surface frequency of CD40+/CD80+ in these cells.(3) However, whether these alterations in the immune response of adult offspring from infected mothers are due to epigenetic changes from the perinatal period remains unclear.
Studies have correlated post-transcriptional changes in the chromatin, through histone acetylation/deacetylation, with the immune response.(6,7,8) In an experimental study on antigen presenting cells (APCs), it was demonstrated that histone deacetylase (HDAC)6 is required for transcriptional activation of IL-10 gene expression in macrophages and dendritic cells through activation of STAT3.(6) Another study using pancreatic beta cell lines showed that knockdown of HDAC1 increased IFN-γ-induced STAT1 phosphorylation.(7) Kosciuczuk et al.(8) showed that deacetylation of cyclin-dependent kinase 9 induced by Sirtuin 2 promotes STAT1 phosphorylation during type I interferon responses.
In addition, it has been demonstrated that the role of epigenetic markers can be remodelled during the perinatal period, and may trigger lasting influences on the epigenome of the offspring.(9) Mice prenatally administered with Acinetobacter lwoffii F78 displayed increased acetylation of histone H4 in the interferon (IFN)-γ gene in their offspring, and conferred protection against asthma after challenge with OA, which is associated with positive regulation of IFN-γ production.(10) Song et al.(11) found that offspring from mothers with peanut allergy had elevated IgE-specific levels, high levels of histamine and resultant increased production of Th2 cytokines, and reduction of DNA methylation at CpG sites of the IL-4 gene promoter after sensitisation.
Histone acetylation is the most commonly studied epigenomic alteration, for stimulation of transcription, and in turn, is reversibly regulated by the balance between the activity of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and HDACs.(12) HDACs have been classified as class I (HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3 and HDAC8), class IIa (HDAC4, HDAC5, HDAC7, and HDAC9), class IIb (HDAC6 and HDAC10), class III (SIRT1 to SIRT7), and class IV (HDAC11)(13) and are increasingly studied due to their interference in the pathways of mechanisms associated with the pathogenesis of various cancers and other inflammatory diseases.(14,15,16)
Although research that relates epigenetic alterations to the maternal-foetal relationship can be found, there are no studies that report the effects of gestation and/or breastfeeding on the expression of HDACs, and the implications for the immune system of offspring from schistosomotic mothers. To investigate, we have evaluated whether the expression of enzymes involved in chromatin remodelling through histone deacetylation can be altered due to gestation or breastfeeding from Schistosoma mansoni-infected mothers. Our results could aid in the discovery of therapeutic targets that improve the immunity of individuals who previously contacted immunological factors resulting from infection during perinatal period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals and maternal infection - Four-week-old Swiss Webster female mice were infected subcutaneously (s.c.) with 20 S. mansoni cercariae, strain São Lourenço da Mata (SLM). On the 45th day, infection was confirmed by the Kato-Katz method.(17) On the 60th day post-infection (dpi), oestrus was synchronised among mice via the administration of 5 i.u. (100 µL) of equine chorionic gonadotrophin hormone, followed by an additional injection with 5 i.u. (100 µL) of human chorionic gonadotrophin 48 h later. Females were housed with male mice at a 1:1 ratio, and successful mating was confirmed by presence of a vaginal plug. The same procedure was performed in noninfected females, and seven-week-old male offspring were taken for the experimental and control groups. The mice were housed in the animal care facility at the Aggeu Magalhães Institute (IAM), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz), municipality of Recife, State of Pernambuco, Brazil.
Adoptive nursing and study groups - Immediately after birth, new-born mice from S. mansoni-infected or noninfected mothers were rehoused with mothers from the opposite group. After adoptive nursing, offspring born from infected mothers (BIM) were suckled by noninfected mothers, and offspring from noninfected mothers were suckled by infected mothers (SIM). A separate group was born from and suckled by schistosomotic mothers (BSIM). Animals born from noninfected females were suckled by their mothers (Control).
Cell culture - Spleens from each animal (seven-weeks-old) were harvested after euthanasia by cervical dislocation. Cell suspensions were prepared in RPMI-1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) supplemented with HEPES (10 µM), 2-mercaptoethanol (0.05 µM), 216 mg of L-glutamine/L, gentamicin (50 mg/L), and 5% of foetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). Cells from each group (n = 8-10) were cultivated at a final concentration of 2 × 107 cells/mL in tissue culture plates (Costar Culture Plates, City, USA) and stimulated with concanavalin-A (Con-A) (5 μg/mL), or without antigenic stimulus (Basal), at 37ºC in 5% CO2. Cultured cells were harvested after 24 h and assayed for immunophenotyping and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR).
Flow cytometry analyses - 5 μL of Golgi Stop (per 2 × 107 cells) were added to each well containing splenic cells under different stimuli, then the cells were vortexed and returned to the CO2 incubator at 37ºC for four additional hours. Spleen cells were subjected to double-labelling with fluorochrome-labelled antibody solutions at a concentration of 0.5 mg/106 cells: FITC anti-mouse CD4, and PE anti-mouse IL-4, APC anti-mouse IFN-γ, PE anti-mouse IL-10, or PerCP-Cy-5.5 anti-mouse IL-2; FITC anti-mouse CD4, PE anti-mouse CD25, and APC anti-mouse FoxP3; FITC anti-mouse CD45R (B220) or FITC anti-mouse CD14, and PE anti-mouse IL-10 (BD Biosciences Pharmingen). After staining, preparations were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing azide (0.1%) and FBS (3%). After centrifugation, the cell pellet was resuspended in PBS with paraformaldehyde (0.5%) and maintained at 4ºC until data acquisition, which was performed using a FACSCalibur (BD-Pharmingen, New Jersey, USA) flow cytometer and acquisition of a minimum 50,000 lymphocytes or 5,000 monocytes. The frequency of positive cells was analysed using FlowJo software, with quadrant gating set based on negative populations and isotype controls. A descriptive analysis of the frequency of cells in the upper right quadrant (double-positive cells) was performed. Distinct gating strategies were used to analyse each subpopulation of cells (Fig. 1). T lymphocyte subpopulations were first selected as CD4 high cells on FL1/anti-CD4-FITC versus laser side-scatter (SSC) dot plots (Fig. 1A). Following this gating procedure, a second gate was set using FL1/anti-CD4-FITC versus FL2/anti-CD25-PE; then, a third gate was established to generate representative 2-dimensional graphics using FL1/anti-CD4-FITC versus FL4/anti-FoxP3-APC to identify triple staining for CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ (Fig. 1B). The frequency of cytokine-expressing cells was further determined on FL1/anti-CD4-FITC versus FL2/anti-IL10-PE or anti-IL4-PE, FL3/anti-IL2-Percp-Cy-5.5 or FL4/anti-IFN-γ-APC dot plots by quadrant statistic measurements, and expressed as percentage of cytokine T CD4+ lymphocyte (Fig. 1C). B Cells and monocytes were first selected on CD45-high or CD14-high cells using FL1/anti-CD45 or CD14-FITC versus SSC dot plots, and the frequency of IL-10 producing cells was subsequently determined using FL1/CD45-FITC or FL1/CD14-FITC versus anti-IL10-PE dot plots and quadrant statistic measurements (Fig. 1D-E).
The results are expressed as the median frequency of cells from each group ± standard error.
qPCR analysis - Total RNA from splenic cells was extracted using the ReliaPrepTM RNA Cell Miniprep System Kit (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was generated with the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Quantitative PCR was performed using SYBR Green master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on the 7500 Real Time System (Applied Biosystems Foster City, CA, USA) machine. Results were normalised to the housekeeping gene β-Actin. Relative expression levels were calculated using 2ΔΔCt. Primers were designed using Primer3Plus software, and the sequences are described in Table.
Statistical analysis - Results were subjected to Barlett’s test to verify whether the distribution of the data was normal. After verifying that the results did not follow a normal distribution, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test when statistical significance was shown. For statistical analysis, we used GraphPad Prism v.5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and findings were considered significant at p < 0.05. All procedures were performed in triplicate to evaluate reproducibility, and images refer to one representative of at least three independent studies.
Ethics - The animal protocol was approved by the Ethical Commission on Animal Use of the Fiocruz (113/2017) and is in accordance with the Ethical Principles in Animal Research adopted by the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation.
Relative expression of HDAC in animals born and/or breastfed from schistosomotic mothers - To verify the epigenetic profile of the animals born and/or breastfed from schistosomotic mothers, real time qPCR was performed on spleen cells cultured for 24 h in absence (basal) or presence of mitogenic stimulus (ConA). For class I HDAC, the basal relative expressions of HDAC1 and HDAC2 were not altered, but with mitogenic stimulus, the group of animals which were breastfed only (SIM) exhibited increased expression compared to the Control (Fig. 2A-B). The groups BIM, SIM, and BSIM had decreased basal relative expression of HDAC3, but with mitogenic stimulus the relative expression was similar to Control (Fig. 2C). There was no difference in the relative expression of HDAC8 either at baseline or with mitogenic stimulation (Fig. 2D).
Class IIa HDACs were analysed, and we saw that there was no difference in HDAC4 expression (Fig. 3A). The relative expression of HDAC5 in the SIM group was lower compared to Control, BIM and BSIM at baseline, but there was no difference among the groups under mitogenic stimulus (Fig. 3B). For HDAC7 the SIM group had l)er expression than Control at baseline, while under mitogenic stimulus the SIM group had increased expression compared to the BIM and BSIM groups (Fig. 3C). Regarding HDAC9, there was no difference at baseline, but the BIM group showed a higher relative expression compared to Control under mitogenic stimulus (Fig. 3D).
Regarding HDACs 6 and 10 (class IIb), there was similar expression among all groups, and did not differ significantly from Control. However, in response to mitogenic stimulus, the expression of HDAC6 and HDAC10 was increased in the SIM group, and HDAC10 was increased in the BSIM group (Fig. 4A-B).
Among sirtuins (class III), the expressions of Sirt1, Sirt3, and Sirt4 were found to be similar among all groups under the culture conditions used (Fig. 5A-C). Sirt2 and Sirt5 did not show any differences in the basal groups, but increased expression was observed in the SIM group compared to Control under mitogenic stimulation (Fig. 5D-E). Fig. 5F shows that compared to Control, the expression of Sirt6 in the SIM group was lower at baseline. However, under mitogenic stimulus, there was a significant increase in the expression of Sirt6 in all experimental groups (BIM, SIM, and BSIM). Although there was no baseline difference for Sirt7, the SIM group had increased expression with mitogenic stimulus compared to the Control, BIM, and BSIM groups (Fig. 5G).
Class IV is composed only of HDAC11 which in this study showed no differences compared to Control, but the SIM group had higher relative expression compared to BIM under mitogenic stimulus (Fig. 6).
Intracellular cytokines in T and B lymphocytes, and monocytes, and the frequency of regulatory T lymphocytes in animals born and/or breastfed - Cytokine producing T lymphocytes were observed by labelling with CD4+/IL-4+, CD4+/IFN-γ+, CD4+/IL-10+, or CD4+/IL-2+, while B lymphocytes and monocytes were labelled with anti-CD45R/B220+ and anti-CD14+ antibodies, respectively, together with anti-IL-10+. T lymphocytes with a regulatory profile were evaluated by triple labelling CD4+CD25+FoxP3+. Frequencies were evaluated with mitogenic stimulus (ConA) and without (basal). Compared to the Control group, the frequency of CD4+/IL-4+ cells under basal conditions and mitogenic stimulation was lower in the SIM and BSIM groups (Fig. 7A). IL-10 production by CD4+ cells was higher in the BIM and BSIM groups under mitogenic stimulation (Fig. 7B). There were no differences among groups when the frequencies of CD4+IL-2+ and CD4+/IFN-γ+ cells (Fig. 7C-D) were analysed.
Regarding IL-10 production by B lymphocytes (Fig. 7E), it was slightly higher in the SIM and BSIM groups in response to mitogen. The SIM and BSIM groups also had an increased frequency of CD14+IL-10+ in comparison to the Control and BIM groups both at baseline and in response to mitogen (Fig. 7F).
For cells expressing CD4+CD25+FoxP3+, the SIM and BSIM groups exhibited decreased frequency relative to the Control and BIM groups, with and without mitogenic stimulus (Fig. 7G).