Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, VOLUME 121 | 2026
Research Articles

Evaluation of the insecticide custody chain and its relationship with malaria burden in the Brazilian Amazon: a process and exploratory impact assessment (2019-2023)

Marcela Lima Dourado1,2,+, Rafaella Albuquerque e Silva2, Márcia Caldas de Castro3, Cássio Roberto Leonel Peterka2,4, Carolina Ribas Kluge2, Daniele Castro1, José Bento Pereira Lima1

1Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
2Ministério da Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brasil
3Harvard University, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, Estados Unidos da América
4Secretaria de Saúde do Estado do Amapá, Macapá, AP, Brasil

DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760250152
310 views 280 downloads
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND Malaria remains a major public health concern in Brazil, with the Amazon region accounting for 99.9% of the country’s cases. Indoor residual spraying (IRS) using Etofenprox 20% PM is a core vector control strategy. However, inefficiencies in the insecticide custody chain, including planning, storage, and distribution, may compromise intervention effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the insecticide custody chain from a process perspective, identifying logistical bottlenecks, while also exploring potential impact by examining associations between insecticide allocation and malaria burden in Brazil and in three high-incidence municipalities in the state of Amazonas (Barcelos, Tefé, and São Gabriel da Cachoeira) from 2019 to 2023. The underlying hypothesis is that in a well-functioning system, insecticide distribution should be correlated with malaria risk determinants, such as epidemiological and environmental variables, rather than merely responding to reported case counts.
METHODS A mixed-methods approach was used. Quantitative analysis applied Pearson correlation, simple and multiple linear regressions (with time-lag), and ARIMA models to evaluate associations between insecticide volume and malaria cases, incorporating environmental and demographic covariates. A complementary qualitative assessment, based on a structured risk matrix, examined failures across four stages of the custody chain: planning, storage, application, and monitoring.
FINDINGS At the national level, insecticide volume was significantly associated with malaria cases (β = 0.161; p = 0.038;
R² = 0.74) and deforestation (β = 0.626; p = 0.034). Time-series analysis revealed a reactive pattern, with insecticide allocation often lagging behind malaria incidence peaks. In the municipalities studied, models lacked statistical significance, but trends suggested weak local planning and disconnects from risk-based forecasting. The risk matrix revealed systemic weaknesses, including limited data interoperability, insufficient integration of environmental indicators, and poor federal coordination.
MAIN CONCLUSIONS The current custody chain functions reactively and lacks integration with surveillance and predictive environmental data, contradicting World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations. Structural reforms are urgently needed. These include: (i) risk-based planning incorporating environmental variables, (ii) interoperable information systems, (iii) improved surveillance of vector resistance, and (iv) intergovernmental agreements for equitable and efficient resource allocation. Findings highlight the need for strategic reorientation of IRS logistics toward anticipatory and data-driven planning. Strengthening the custody chain through intersectoral coordination and environmental intelligence is essential not only to improve operational efficiency but also to increase the cost-effectiveness and epidemiological impact of malaria control interventions in the Amazon. Lessons learned may inform broader efforts in other endemic regions aiming for malaria elimination.

REFERENCES
01. MS - Ministério da Saúde. Elimina malária Brasil: plano nacional de eliminação da malária. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2022. p. 1-60. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/.
02. MS - Ministério da Saúde. Guia para gestão local do controle da malária: controle vetorial. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2009. p. 1-64. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/ guia_gestao_local_controle_vetorial.pdf.
03. WHO - World Health Organization. Guidelines for malaria vector control. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
04. WHO - World Health Organization. Guidelines for risk management in health supply chains. Geneva: WHO; 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications.
05. Caldas de Castro M, Yamagata Y, Mtasiwa D, Tanner M, Utzinger J, Keiser J, et al. Integrated urban malaria control: a case study in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004; 71(Suppl. 2): 103-17.
06. Castro MC, Singer BH. Meio ambiente e saúde: metodologia para análise espacial da ocorrência de malária em projetos de assentamento. Rev Bras Estud Popul. 2007; 24(2): 247-62.
07. Tomas RN, Alcantara RLC. Modelos para gestão de riscos em cadeias de suprimentos: revisão, análise e diretrizes para futuras pesquisas. Gestão & Produção. 2013; 20(3): 695-712.
08. MS - Ministério da Saúde. Monitoramento dos casos de arboviroses até a semana epidemiológica 52 de 2022 e Malária na região extra-amazônica do Brasil: série histórica de 2010 a 2021. Boletim Epidemiológico. 2022; 53(30): p. 1-35.
09. MS - Ministério da Saúde. Dia mundial de luta contra a malária. Boletim Epidemiológico. 2021; 52(15): 1-27. Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/media/pdf/2021/abril/26/boletim_ epidemiologico_svs_dia-mundial-da-malaria.pdf.
10. Ferreira MU, Castro MC. Challenges for malaria elimination in Brazil. Malar J. 2016; 15(1): 284.
11. Singer BH, Castro MC. Agricultural colonization and malaria on the Amazon frontier. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001; 954: 184-222.
12. INPE - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. Dados de desmatamento na Amazônia. TerraBrasilis. 2024. Available from: https://terrabrasilis.dpi.inpe.br/app/dashboard/deforestation/biomes/ amazon/increments.
13. Arisco NJ, Peterka C, Diniz C, Singer BH, Castro MC. Ecological change increases malaria risk in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024; 121(44): e2409583121.
14. Acebes F, González-Varona JM, López-Paredes A, Pajares J. Beyond probability-impact matrices in project risk management: a quantitative methodology for risk prioritisation. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024; 11: 670.

+ Corresponding author: marcelalima88@gmail.com | ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1193-0122
Received 13 June 2025
Accepted 28 October 2025

HOW TO CITE
Dourado ML, Silva RA, Castro MC, Peterka CRL, Kluge CR, Castro D, et al. Evaluation of the insecticide custody chain and its relationship with malaria burden in the Brazilian Amazon: a process and exploratory impact assessment (2019-2023). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2025; 120: e250152.

HANDLING EDITOR
Adeilton Alves Brandão| ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-607X

Our Location

Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

Av. Brasil 4365, Castelo Mourisco 
sala 201, Manguinhos, 21040-900 
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Tel.: +55-21-2562-1222

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Support Program

logo iocb

logo governo federal03h 
faperj   cnpq capes