Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, 94 (Suppl.I) September 1999
Original Article

Epidemiology of Chagas Disease in Ecuador. A Brief Review

H Marcelo Aguilar VII +, Fernando Abad-FranchI, José Racines VII,
Aura Paucar C

Instituto 'Juan César García', Fundación Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Salud, Casilla Postal 17-1106292 Quito, Ecuador
IPathogen Molecular Biology and Biochemistry Unit, Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
IIInstituto Nacional de Higiene y Medicina Tropical 'Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez', Quito, Ecuador

Page: 387-393
2241 views 654 downloads

Chagas disease is a complex public health problem that has been underestimated in Ecuador. Here we review the relevant published information, and present unpublished and new data that help to understand the current Chagas disease epidemiological situation and its evolution in the country. Three main characteristics have been identified: (i) persistence ofu00a0Trypanosoma cruziu00a0transmission in already known foci; (ii) a marked endemicity in some urban areas of Guayaquil; and (iii) the transformation of new Amazon foci into truly endemic areas. The situation in other suspect areas remains uncertain. Five Triatominae species have been implicated in the transmission ofu00a0T. cruziu00a0to people in Ecuador (Triatoma dimidiata, Rhodnius ecuadoriensis, R. pictipes, R. robustusu00a0andu00a0Panstrongylus geniculatus), but some others may also play a role in some areasu00a0(P. rufotuberculatus, P. howardi, T. carrioniu00a0andu00a0P. chinai). Other Triatominae reported seem to have little or no epidemiological relevanceu00a0(T. venosa, T. dispar, Eratyrus mucronatus, E. cuspidatus, P. lignariusu00a0andu00a0Cavernicola pilosa). High frequency of acute cases and severe chronic disease has been observed. Although cardiomyopathy is more frequent, serious digestive disease is also present. It is estimated that around 120,000-200,000 people may be infected. 2.2 to 3.8 million people are estimated to live under transmission risk conditions.

The current situation of Chagas disease in Ecuador is the subject of various ongoing epidemiological, entomological and clinical studies. With the aim of summarising the published information available and recent or unpublished data that may be remarkably helpful for researchers and control agents, we undertook a critical review about these crucial topics. Our purpose is to contribute to set the scientific basis necessary to the National Control Programme currently in preparation in Ecuador.

It is estimated that 2.24 to 3.8 million people in all, from a total population of around 11 million, are exposed to the risk ofTripanosoma cruzi transmission. These estimates indicate that 120,000-200,000 people would be infected, with chagasic cardiopathy as the dominant chronic form (Aguilar & Yépez 1996). Previous estimates suggested that only 30,000 people were infected (UNDP/World Bank/WHO TDR 1997).



Some archaeological, pre-Columbian findings from the province of Manabí suggest that Romaña's sign was already known in those areas before the arrival of the Europeans to the coastal region of Ecuador (cf. Alvarez 1984). During the Spanish conquest, some of the Pizarro soldiers suffered from a disease they described as "eye sickness" acquired at the Portoviejo valley in Manabí around 1530. The descriptions resemble the characteristic lesions of Romaña's sign, and Álvarez (1984) attributes them to Chagas disease. This is also consistent with the high frequency of acute forms later recorded in the area.

Stal and Whymper (cf. Campos 1923) reported the presence of the principal vector, Triatoma dimidiata, in the Ecuadorian coastal region in the last century. In 1917, Tamayo established the association between the insect bite and a clinical picture including local inflammation, oedema and fever (Valenzuela 1939).

Arteaga (1930) studied the existence of American trypanosomiasis in the zone of the Coastal Railroad (Guayaquil-Salinas). In 1927 Arteaga verified the presence of human infection and triatomine bugs in the area of Santa Elena, and the following investigations certified that Chagas disease was endemic in the urban area of Guayaquil, with T. dimidiatacolonies breeding within the cane and wood houses. The Santa Ana and El Carmen hills, two urban areas of Guayaquil, were the most strongly affected, and they seem to remain so nowadays.

During the 40s and 50s new disease foci were reported from the provinces of Guayas, Manabí, Los Ríos, and in temperate areas of the Andean provinces of Loja, Azuay and Bolívar. It is today accepted that the main endemic areas are located in the provinces of Guayas, Manabí and El Oro. But new foci reported from the Amazon region and currently under investigation (Amunárriz et al. 1991, Amunárriz 1991, Chico et al. 1997, Abad-Franch 1998, Abad-Franch et al. 1998a,b) strongly suggest that the northern Ecuadorian Amazon basin is to be considered an endemic area as well. The lack of systematic studies in other provinces makes it complicated to assert that the disease is not endemic in areas (e.g., in the provinces of Los Ríos, Esmeraldas, Pastaza, Loja, Imbabura, Pichincha, Azuay, etc.) where ecological and socio-economic traits are quite similar to those of well-known chagasic zones.



The main vector species of Chagas disease in the Pacific slope of the Ecuadorian Andes are T. dimidiata and Rhodnius ecuadoriensisT. dimidiata can be found in human dwellings in the provinces of Guayas, Manabí, Los Ríos, and El Oro (Lent & Wygodzinsky 1979, Defranc 1982, Lazo 1985). A recent observation includes the province of Loja (Abad-Franch et al., unpublished). R. ecuadoriensis has been reported from Manabí, Guayas, Loja and El Oro (Defranc 1982, Lazo 1985, Romaña et al. 1994), but our observations indicate that sylvatic forms of this species can be found in subtropical valleys of the province of Pichincha (Abad-Franch et al., unpublished), probably in relation to Phytelephas palm trees, as reported by Romaña et al. (1994) in other areas.

Three triatomine species seem to be involved in the Amazon basin foci: R. pictipesR. robustus and Panstrongylus geniculatus (Espinoza 1955, Amunárriz 1991, Amunárriz et al. 1991, Chico et al. 1997, Abad-Franch et al. 1998a,b, Zabala unpublished). These five species may therefore be considered as the ones that actually transmit T. cruzi to people in the well-characterised endemic areas. The apparent trend to establish domestic and/or peridomestic colonies observed in the last three species in some areas of the Amazon basin (Barrett 1988, Amunárriz, 1991, Chico et al. 1997, Valente et al. 1998) is particularly worrying. However, adults have shown their capacity to fly into the houses to feed during the night from their breeding sites (palm trees, bromeliaceae, mammals burrows), without establishing permanent colonies within human-related structures (Lent & Wygodzinsky 1979, Miles et al. 1981, Barrett 1988, Schofield 1994). Some environmental changes introduced by man during the last 20 years seem to play a role in this process: colonisation of primary rainforest, deforestation, hunting, agriculture, breeding of domestic animals near the houses or the introduction of electric light may be factors involved (Abad-Franch 1998). P. geniculatus distribution in Ecuador is probably broader that reported (Manabí, Imbabura, Napo, Sucumbíos and Pichincha) (Rodríguez 1959, Defranc 1982, Amunárriz 1991, Amunárriz et al. 1991, Chicoet al. 1997, Zabala unpublished); we studied several specimens belonging to this species from Quinindé (province of Esmeraldas), a zone where no previous reports indicate its presence (Abad-Franch et al., unpublished observations).

Other species seem to have some epidemiological significance in smaller areas. T. carrioni is a semidomestic species from southern Ecuador (León 1949, Espinoza 1955, Lent & Wygodzinsky 1979, Defranc 1982, Reyes 1992); nevertheless, recent observations indicate that its distribution may be significantly broader, reaching the subtropical valleys near Quito, in the province of Pichincha (Abad-Franch et al., unpublished observations).

P. rufotubercutalus can be found near or inside houses in the provinces of El Oro, Manabí and Loja (Defranc 1982, Lazo 1985, Reyes 1992, Zabala unpublished, Racines et al. unpublished). We have identified two adult specimens from the province of Pichincha; its presence in Guayas needs further investigation. This species seems to be adapting to human habitats in Bolivia, and it may be able to colonise dwellings after T. infestans eradication by spraying (Noireau et al. 1994).

P. howardi is considered to be of Ecuadorian origin (Lent & Wygodzinsky 1979, Defranc 1982). Its distribution seems to be very limited (in the province of Manabí), but few studies have been conducted in relation to this species. Our observations confirm that it is not uncommon to find adult specimens within human dwellings, and that misidentifications with T. dimidiata are not a rare event (even by trained personnel linked to the vector control service). These species, belonging to different genera, share their general chromatic pattern and are of similar size. The actual vectorial role of this species at the local level needs to be established in Manabí.

Other species present in Ecuador and potentially involved in T. cruzi transmission are T. venosa, found to breed inside houses in some areas of Colombia (D'Alessandro & Barreto 1985), Eraturys mucronatus,a species able to invade and colonise human environments (Lent & Wy-godzinsky 1979, D'Alessandro & Barreto 1985, Noireau et al. 1995)and P. chinai (Lent & Wygodzinsky 1979, Defranc 1982, Reyes 1992).

Cavernicola pilosaT. dispar and Pans-trongylus lignarius, apparently with no epidemiological importance, have been reported from the Amazon basin (Rodríguez 1961, Lent & Wygodzinsky 1979, Defranc 1987, Abad-Franch et al. 1998a, Zabala unpublished). We recently identified one adult male apparently belonging to the species P. herreri captured in the Amazon basin (Abad-Franch et al. in prep.). E. cuspidatus has also been reported from Ecuador (cf. Defranc 1982).Our studies indicate that R. stali (Lent et al. 1993) is not present in the Ecuadorian Amazon region. Reports indicating the presence of R. prolixus in El Oro and Loja, Manabí or Napo/Orellana are doubtful (Defranc 1982, Cueva & Romero 1987) and probably due to misidentifi-cation. Equally dubious is the record of T. infestans in Esmeraldas and Imbabura (cf. Defranc 1982).



The T. cruzi infection prevalence rates in various areas of the country, as reported in different studies, are reviewed inTable, together with the authors, date and techniques used.

The interpretation of these data suggests that the main endemic areas, where the disease is still being actively transmitted, correspond to the provinces of El Oro in the southern coastal region, and Guayas and Manabí in central and northern Pacific coast. The northern Amazon region, including the provinces of Sucumbíos, Napo and Orellana, should be included in the list of endemic areas. This zone is characterised by intensive migratory pressure linked to petrol exploitation and subsequent colonisation. The possibility that the environmental changes introduced during the last 20 years might have favoured Chagas disease transmission in the area needs further investigation (Abad-Franch 1998). As mentioned, the situation in other provinces remains uncertain, but their common traits make us think that, at least in some zones, the disease may be present as well. Migration from endemic areas to the city of Guayaquil and the northern Amazon is very important from the early 70s; this trend may also play a role in the epidemiological pattern of these areas (Aguilar & Yépez 1996); the introduction of parasite strains from the coast needs further investigation, as all data indicate that vectors have not been passively transported to the area.

Grijalva et al. (1997, 1998) report a prevalence of 0.02% positives for T. cruzi infection among blood donors at the Red Cross Blood Bank in Quito, and 0.13% in samples from other provinces. In a previous report, Grijalva et al. (1995) reported prevalences of 12.1% and 6.1% positives in two collections from the Red Cross Blood Bank in Quito (345 samples in total, analysed by ELISA plus Western Blotting).



Acute clinical disease - Historical data show that from the early 20s it was not uncommon that clinical pictures compatible with the Romaña's sign were diagnosed at hospitals in Guayaquil. Varas (1942) indicate that this form of periorbital oedema was extremely frequent in the city. Subsequent studies continued to show this trait (Espinoza 1955, Rodríguez 1961, 1963, Gómez 1968, Rassi 1979, Álvarez 1984). In a recent series, Galindo (unpublished data) registered 560 acute cases from the records of the National Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. These cases are in the majority from the provinces of Guayas, Manabí, El Oro and Los Ríos, all in the coastal region (Galindo, pers. comm.). We studied a series of five acute cases from the northern Amazon in 1994 (unpublished data); all of them were children under nine with fever, generalised oedema, hepatosplenomegaly and signs of myocarditis.

Chronic chagas disease - Both heart and digestive forms of the disease have been reported from Ecuador. Galindo (1958, 1959) found chagasic etiology in 20% of 150 cardiac patients in Guayaquil. 20.68% of positives were under 40 years old and presented cardiopathy stage VI following the WHO/PAHO criteria (1974). More than 50% of those patients died in the next 15 months. Gómez (1968) found electrocardiographic signs compatible with chagasic cardiopathy in 1.4% of randomly selected, apparently healthy people. Kawabata et al. (1987) reported that 40% of 154 seropositives from El Oro and Guayas presented typical electrocardiographic abnormalities. In a series of 25 chagasic heart patients, we found that 53% met the WHO/PAHO criteria for cardiopathy stage I, and 47% for stage II and III (unpublished data).

Digestive forms are estimated to represent around 3% of chronic Chagas disease cases, and seem to be mainly from El Oro (Galindo, unpublished). Guevara et al. (1997) reported two cases of severe digestive Chagas disease, confirmed by PCR, in patients from Loja (southwest) and Morona Santiago (south Amazon region) with megacolon. This digestive form seems to be more frequent than megaoesophagus, but further studies are required.



Chagas disease is a major public health problem classically underestimated in Ecuador. Prevalence estimates based upon infection rates reported from studied areas and demographic official data indicate that up to 200,000 people may be already infected, while data published by WHO report only 30,000 (UNDP/World Bank/WHO TDR 1997). The presence of a variety of actual or potential vector species, and recent data indicating that transmission actively persists, makes it imperative to accomplish a comprehensive and systematic control programme in the well-known endemic areas, and sero-entomological surveys in other coastal and Amazon provinces. Some of such studies are currently ongoing, but substantial efforts are still needed. A standardised methodology has to be established in order to enable comparisons between different studies. The dynamics of transmission in the Amazon region should be clarified as a research priority. Studies on vector biology and population genetics are also required (Schofield et al. 1995, 1996). In general, we understand that a serious and broad public health action, following the WHO recommendations (WHO 1991), and under the co-ordination of the Andean countries initiative to interrupt the transmission of Chagas disease (UNDP/World Bank/WHO TDR 1997), is essential to respond adequately to this important public health problem.



Abad-Franch F 1998. Impacto de las alteraciones medioambientales en la transmisión vectorial de Trypanosoma cruzi. Conference at the Round Table `Alteraciones ambientales: impacto en el compor-tamiento de enfermedades emergentes y reemergen-tes'. V Congreso de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Microbiología/Asociación Latino-americana de Microbiología, Quito, Ecuador, July 1998 (Program and Abstracts in press).

Abad-Franch F, Onore G, Racines VJ, Aguilar VHM 1998a. Distribución de Triatominae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae), vectores de Trypanosoma cruzi, en la Amazonía ecuatoriana. Short Communication. V Congreso de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Microbiología/Asociación Latinoamericana de Microbiología, Quito, Ecuador, July 1998 (Program and Abstracts in press).

Abad-Franch F, Racines VJ, Aguilar VHM, Grijalva M, Onore G 1998b. Extension of Chagas disease to the Ecuadorian Amazon basin: a new endemic area? Program and Abstracts of the 47th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, San Juan, Puerto Rico (meeting cancelled). Am J Trop Med Hyg 59 (Suppl.)329-330.

Aguilar VHM, Yépez R 1996. Evolución epidemiológica de la enfermedad de Chagas en Ecuador, p. 30-38. In CJ Schofield, JP Dujardin & J Jurberg (eds), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Population Genetics and Control of Triatominae, Santo Domingo de los Colorados, Ecuador, 1995. INDRE, Mexico City, 116 pp.

Álvarez CJ 1984. Historia de la Medicina Tropical Ecuatoriana III. Enfermedad de Chagas en el Ecuador,Arquidiocesana Justicia y Paz, Guayaquil, 233 pp.

Amunárriz M 1991. Enfermedad de Chagas. Primer foco amazónico, p. 27-37. In Amunárriz M Estudios sobre Patologías Tropicales en la Amazonía Ecuatoriana, CICAME, Pompeya, Napo, Ecuador.

Amunárriz MU, Chico ME, Guderian RH 1991. Chagas' disease in Ecuador: a sylvatic focus in the Amazon region. Am J Trop Med Hyg 94: 145-149.

Arteaga CL 1930. Investigaciones sobre la existencia de la enfermedad de Chagas en la zona del ferrocarril de la costa (Provincia del Guayas). Rev Univ Guayaquil 1: 89-101.

Barrett TV 1988. Current research on Amazonian Triatominae. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 83 (Suppl. I): 441-447.

Campos RF 1923. Notas bibliográficas sobre el Triatoma dimidiataRev Col Vicente Rocafuerte 12-14: 107-111.

Chico HM, Sandoval C, Guevara EA, Calvopiña HM, Cooper PJ, Reed SG, Guderian RH 1997. Chagas disease in Ecuador: evidence for disease transmission in an indigenous population in the Amazon region. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 92: 317-320.

Cueva IO, Romero SR 1987. Estudio epidemiológico de la enfermedad de Chagas en la provincia de Loja. p. 151.Los problemas de salud en el Ecuador. Memorias de los Simposios, Dirección Nacional del Seguro Social Campesino, Quito, Ecuador.

D'Alessandro A, Barreto P 1985. Colombia, p. 377-399. In RU Carcavallo, JE Rabinovich & RJ Tonn (eds.)Factores Biológicos y Ecológicos de la Enfermedad de Chagas, vol. II: Centro Panamericano de Ecología Humana y Salud OPS/OMS Servicio Nacional de Chagas, Ministerio de Salud y Acción Social, República Argentina.

Defranc MI 1982. Enfermedad de Chagas. Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana, Núcleo del Guayas, Guayaquil, 275 pp.

Defranc MI 1987. Prevalencia de la enfermedad de Chagas en el Ecuador. Informe 1983-1986. Rev Ecuat Hig Med Trop 37: 13-47.

Espinoza LA 1955. Epidemiología de la enfermedad de Chagas en la República del Ecuador. Rev Ecuat Hig Med Trop 12: 25-105.

Galindo SV 1958. Frecuencia chagásica en 150 cardio-megálicos. Rev Ecuat Hig Med Trop 15: 205-216.

Galindo SV 1959. Cardiopatía chagásica crónica. Primeros casos en el Ecuador, demostrados parasi-tológicamente. Rev Ecuat Hig Med Trop 16: 9-20.

Gómez LLF 1968. El problema de la enfermedad de Chagas en Guayaquil. Rev Ecuat Hig Med Trop 25: 3-10.

Grijalva MJ, Chiriboga R, Racines VJ, Escalante L, Rowland EC 1997. Short Report: Screening for Trypanosoma cruzi in the blood supply by the Red Cross Blood Bank in Quito, Ecuador. Am J Trop Med Hyg 57: 740-741.

Grijalva MJ, Rowland EC, Powell MR, McCormick TS, Escalante L 1995. Blood donors in a vector-free zone of Ecuador potentially infected with Trypanosoma cruziAm J Trop Med Hyg 52: 360-363.

Grijalva MJ, Rowland EC, Escalante L, Costales J, Racines VJ 1998. Transmisión de la enfermedad de Chagas asociada a transfusiones sanguíneas en los bancos de sangre del Ecuador. Short Communication. V Congreso de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Microbiología/Asociación Latinoamericana de Microbiología, Quito, Ecuador, July 1998 (Program and Abstracts in press).

Guevara AG, Eras JW, Recalde M, Vinueza L, Cooper PJ, Ouassi A, Guderian RH 1997. Severe digestive pathology associated with chronic Chagas disease in Ecuador: report of two cases. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 30: 389-392.

Kawabata M, Uchiyama T, Mimori T, Hashiguchi T, Vera de Coronel V 1987. Association of electrocardiographic abnormalities with seropositivity to Trypanosoma cruzi in Ecuador. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 81: 7-10.

Lazo R 1985. Parásitos, reservorios, control. Situación regional de la enfermedad de Chagas en Ecuador, p. 413-427. In RU Carcavallo, JE Rabinovich & RJ Tonn (eds), Factores Biológicos y Ecológicos de la Enfermedad de Chagas, vol. II: Centro Pana-mericano de Ecología Humana y Salud OPS/OMS, Servicio Nacional de Chagas, Ministerio de Salud y Acción Social, República Argentina.

Lent H, Wygodzinsky P 1979. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), and their significance as vectors of Chagas' disease. Bull Am Mus Nat History 163: 123-520.

Lent H, Jurberg J, Galvão C 1993. Rhodnius stali n. sp., afim de Rhodnius pictipes Stal, 1872 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 88: 605-614.

León LA 1949. Información sobre el problema de la enfermedad de Chagas en el Ecuador. Bol Ofic Sanit Panam 28: 569-585.

León LA, León B 1976. Paleopatología dermatológica ecuatoriana. Medicina Rev Mex 1205.

Miles MA, de Souza AA, Povoa M 1981. Chagas disease in the Amazon basin. III. Ecotopes of ten triatomine bug species (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) from the vicinity of Belém, Pará State, Brazil. J Med Entomol 18: 266-278.

Mimori T, Kawabata M, Gómez E, Vera de Coronel V, Aroca de M, Flor T, Hasiguchi Y 1985. A seroepidemiological survey of Chagas diseases and search for reservoir hosts in two endemic areas of Ecuador.Japan J Trop Med Hyg 13: 245-250.

Montalván JA 1950. Ensayos de profilaxis de la enfermedad de Chagas en Guayaquil. Rev Ecuat Hig Med Trop8-9 : 4.

Noireau F, Bosseno MF, Carrasco R, Telleria J, Vargas F, Camacho C, Yaksic N, Brenière SF 1995. Sylvatic triatomines (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in Bolivia: trends toward domesticity and possible infection withTrypanosoma cruzi (Kinetoplastida: Trypanoso-matidae). J Med Entomol 32: 594-598.

Noireau F, Bosseno MF, Vargas F, Brenière SF 1994. Apparent trend to domesticity observed in Panstrongylus rufotuberculatus Champion, 1899 (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in Bolivia. Res Rev Parasitol 54: 263-264.

Racines VJ, Avilés H, Armijos R, Ortega M, Romaña C, Lema F 1994. Seroprevalencia de la infección aTrypanosoma cruzi en escolares de la Provincia del El Oro. Microbiología 1: 50.

Rassi A 1979. Clínica: fase aguda, p. 249-264. In Z Brener & Z Andrade (eds) Trypanosoma cruzi e Doença de Chagas. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro.

Reyes LV 1992. Enfermedad de Chagas, p. 134-137. In R Sempértegui, P Naranjo & M Padilla (eds) Panorama Epidemiológico del Ecuador. Ministerio de Salud Pública-Unicef. Quito, Ecuador, 252 pp.

Rodríguez JD 1959. Epidemiología de la enfermedad de Chagas en la República del Ecuador. Rev Goiana Medica 5: 411-438.

Rodríguez JD 1961. Nuevos datos sobre la enfermedad de Chagas en Guayaquil. Rev Ecuat Hig Med Trop 18:48-52.

Rodríguez JD 1963. Antecedentes y primeros resultados de la campaña antichagásica en un sector de la ciudad de Guayaquil. Rev Ecuat Hig Med Trop 20: 13-15.

Romaña C, Racines VJ, Avilés H, Lema F 1994. Observaciones de domiciliación de Rhodnius ecuadoriensis en focos endémicos de la enfermedad de Chagas en el Ecuador. Microbiología 1: 59.

Schofield CJ 1994. Triatominae. Biología y control. Eurocommunica Publications, West Sussex, UK, 80 pp.

Schofield CJ, Dujardin JP & Jurberg J 1995. Population genetics of Triatominae: support for vigilance and control interventions. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 90 (Suppl. I): 57.

Schofield CJ, Dujardin JP, Jurberg J. 1996 Proceedings of the International Workshop on Population Genetics and Control of Triatominae, Santo Domingo de los Colorados, Ecuador, Sept. 1995. INDRE, Mexico City, 116 pp.

UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR) 1997. Andean countries initiative launched in Colombia. TDR News 53: 3.

Valente VC, Valente AS, Noireau F, Carrasco HJ, Miles MA 1998. Chagas disease in the Amazon basin: association of Panstrongylus geniculatus (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) with domestic pigs. J Med Entomol 35: 99-103.

Valenzuela V 1939. Breve resumen sobre patología médica ecuatoriana y su distribución geográfica. Rev Univ Guayaquil 10.

Varas SJM 1942. Edema palpebral febril tripanoso-miásico. An Soc Med-Quir Guayas 22: 979-998.

WHO-World Health Organization 1991. Control of Chagas Disease. WHO Technical Report Series 811, 95 pp.

WHO/PAHO 1974. Aspectos clínicos de la enfermedad de Chagas. Informe de una reunión conjunta OPS/OMS de investigadores. Bol Ofic Sanit Panam.

This work received financial support from the UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), grant no. 970195, and benefited from international support through the ECLAT Network. Dr Fernando Abad-Franch received funds from a Research Grant awarded by the Tropical Medicine Unit at the General University Hospital, University of Valencia, Spain.


+Corresponding author. Fax:+593-2-455797.


Received 9 June 1999


Accepted 9 August 1999

Our Location

Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

Av. Brasil 4365, Castelo Mourisco 
sala 201, Manguinhos, 21040-900 
Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Tel.: +55-21-2562-1222

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Support Program

logo iocb

logo governo federal03d 
faperj cnpq capes